Talk:Free network architecture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Isaac →freedomnode: new section |
imported>Bnewbold |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Looking at this for the first time in a while, I realized that we need to update it to reflect the modularization of freedomnode versus freedombox. =) | Looking at this for the first time in a while, I realized that we need to update it to reflect the modularization of freedomnode versus freedombox. =) | ||
* yup. this page is written like a pitch/vision; I was going to create a new "Free Network Stack" page to describe the most-up-to-date plans for how it will all fit together, and maintain that --[[User:Bnewbold|Bnewbold]] 16:48, 14 June 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:48, 14 June 2012
Wouldn't it be better to use the term "Tiers" instead of "Layers" ??
The term "layers" normally refers to layers in a networking protocol stack, usually based on the original OSI definition, e.g. Ethernet is layer 2, IP is layer 3 and TCP is layer 4. Since this usage is so pervasive in networking I suggest you substitute something, for eample Tiers.
freedomnode
Looking at this for the first time in a while, I realized that we need to update it to reflect the modularization of freedomnode versus freedombox. =)
- yup. this page is written like a pitch/vision; I was going to create a new "Free Network Stack" page to describe the most-up-to-date plans for how it will all fit together, and maintain that --Bnewbold 16:48, 14 June 2012 (CDT)